BS Analysis 1
· 3 min read
Consolidated Findings Across the three recent reviews, the same core weaknesses kept cropping up:
-
Rule Mis‑application
- DI signs were inverted or mis‑stated.
- RSI‐slope and MACD histogram magnitudes were compared incorrectly.
- The “volume > SMA” gate was never enforced, yet volume was still treated as confirmatory.
-
Narrative Bias
- The prose templates let analysts hand‑wave around failed gates (“potential institutional involvement”), producing forced verdicts even when neither market truly qualified.
-
Lack of Transparency
- No clear scoring or weighting system—decisions rest on vague “stronger” or “more extreme” language rather than hard thresholds.
